|
|

|
|
Chirang district's
prominent citizens welcome a new Dzongda (district administrator) in 1982. All chimis (National Assembly Members) and Gups (head of a group of villages) of Chirang district are captured in this group
photograph. The
current status of those in this picture reveals the story of Bhutanese refugees. |
| NAME |
DESIGNATION |
CURRENT STATUS |
| 1. Big Bahadur Gurung |
Gup, Emiray |
Refugee |
| 2. Churamani Chamlagai |
Gup, Kikorthang |
Refugee |
| 3. Damber Singh Gurung |
Gup, Dunglagang |
Deceased |
| 4. Kharka Bahadur Kharga |
Gup, Tshokana |
Refugee |
| 5. Bal Bahadur Burathoki |
Gup, Shemjong |
Refugee |
| 6. Lok Nath Basnet |
Chimi |
Refugee |
| 7. Tek Nath Rizal |
Chimi (Councillor
from '84) |
Released from prison in 1999
after 10 years. |
| 8. K.B.Chuwan |
Chimi |
Refugee |
| 9. Phub Tenzin |
Gup, Chirangdara |
In Bhutan |
| 10.Dhanapati Adhikari |
Gup, Phuntenchu |
Refugee |
| 11.Phogay Dukpa |
Gup, Pattalay |
In Bhutan |
| 12.Hem Lal Chamlagai |
Gup, Goseling |
Refugee |
| 13.Kul Chandra Timsina |
Gup, Gairigaon |
Refugee |
| 14.Dhanapati Ghimire |
Gup, Lamidara |
Refugee |
| 15.Dilli Ram Dahal |
Gup, Chanautay |
Refugee |
| (Sitting, From Left to Right) |
|
|
| 1. K.B.Subba |
Gup, Dorona |
In Bhutan |
| 2. Rudra Kumar Khatiwara |
Gup, Suntalay |
Refugee |
| 3. Damchu Lhendup |
Dzongrab |
In Service |
| 4. Chagay |
Thrimpon |
Retired |
| 5. H.K.Humagai |
Dzongdag, Outgoing |
Employed by UNDP, Thimphu |
| 6. Oko Tshering |
Dzongdag, Incoming |
Dismissed from service |
| 7. Akal Bahadur Rai |
Gup, Beteni |
In Prison |
THE STORY OF REFUGEES
a
picture paints a thousands words
If at one time the Bhutanese regime
attempted to profess complete innocence by alleging that those in the camps were
not Bhutanese at all but Indian Nepalis evicted from the north-eastern states of
India and poor Nepalis from the vicinity of the camps, it is now attempting to
absolve itself by claiming that refugees who can prove that they are Bhutanese
have, in fact, already forfeited their citizenship by 'voluntarily' emigrating
from Bhutan. The changing stand of the Royal Government of Bhutan with regard to
the status of the people in the refugee camps in eastern Nepal should suffice to
indicate the less than honest intentions of the regime.
The photograph show all eighteen
representatives of the people of the Chirang District during the year 1982. At
that time, because of its primarily Lhotshampa population, the sub-division of
Dagapela formed a part of Chirang despite its geographical location within
Dagana district. Thus, the Chimi (National Assembly Member) representing
Dagapela and the Gups of the three Gewogs (a 'Block' consisting of a group of
villages) of Dagapela are also in the picture. Dagapela was merged with Dagana
district in 1985.
The Gup is the main link between the
administration and the people. Assisted by one or more assistants (called Chipons in
the north, Karbaris in the South), depending on the number of households, the
Gup is responsible for all records and data pertaining to land, taxes,
population etc. He facilitates and records land transaction, collects revenue,
records marriages and births, settles minor disputes etc. He is also responsible
for organising and arranging labour contributions and for ensuring that
government notifications are transmitted and disseminated.
The Chimi is supposed to be the
spokesperson of the people at the National Assembly. Conditions, however, are
not conducive to frank exchanges. In any case, the low representation of
Lhotshampas in the Assembly, 14 out of 150, (containing a sixth of the country's
population, Chirang, including Dagapela, has only 3 members) renders any attempts
to draw attention to southern Bhutanese concerns futile. Nonetheless, during the
currency of their terms, Chimis who are 'elected' by the people received due
respect.
The plight of the majority from
these 1982 group of prominent citizens from Chirang is a pointer to the plight
of the southern Bhutanese population in general. Of the eighteen representatives
of the public who served as the bridge between the Royal Government of Bhutan
and the people of Chirang district in 1982, two are understandably in Bhutan
because of their Ngalong (north-western Bhutanese) descent. From among the
sixteen Lhotshampas, one has died, one is still in his village, two are in
prison and the remaining twelve are all refugees in Nepal.
When the government was successful
in finding the means to evict even such people who are generally known and
respected in the villages, the average illiterate farmer had little chance.
Belonging to well established families and generally among the to well-to-do
in their respective villages, these individuals had even stronger motives to
stay. As representatives accustomed to the government machinery, in the
desperate attempts to prove their nationality these individuals were also better
informed and more capable of proving their bona fides. Yet, as their current plight shows, they were not
successful. Will anyone believe that people living in relative comfort will
willingly leave behind home, land and property and opt to "voluntarily
emigrate" to a refugee camp ? Is it conceivable that an entire lot of
representatives could all be of questionable pedigree and, therefore, not
deserving of Bhutanese nationality and citizenship ? Or, will the Royal
Government of Bhutan argue that the individuals in this picture are not who they
claim to be?
Source: HUROB Annual Report, 1993.

|