|
CONTENTS:
IV.
THE ANTI-NATIONAL PROBLEM IN SOUTHERN BHUTAN
INTRODUCTION
1. Eviction of ngolops
2. Application of the Law against the ngolops
3. Extradition of ngolops and discussion with neighbouring
countries on this point.
4. Holding of Important Posts and Sensitive Responsibilities by
Lhotshampas
5. Allotment of Illegal Excess Land in
southern Bhutan
6. Withdrawal of Citizenship Identity Cards:
7. No Citizenship for Non-Nationals married to Bhutanese Citizens
8. Identification of ngolops and their collaborators
9. Checking of Identity Cards and Vehicles at the Checkposts
10. Matters relating to dual citizenship
11. Matter concerning Form No. '5' of the Census Records
12. Implementation of the Citizenship Act
13. Revival of the tradition of the Pazaab System (Militia)
21. Greater priority for the nation & security than for
development works
VI. Objection to the documentation of His Majesty's pledge to
abdicate
INTRODUCTION
From the second day of its 70th
Session, the National Assembly deliberated on the problems created by the
anti-national uprising in southern Bhutan. The representatives of the public of
the 18 Dzongkhags put forth several proposals towards overcoming these problems
and restoring peace and tranquility, in the country once again. During the
deliberations, the representatives of the Government. the Monk Body and the
Public were all unanimous and single minded in expressing the need to take every
measure necessary to safeguard the security, and well-being of the Kingdom of
the Palden Drukpa
The members recalled that past
Bhutanese generations had made great sacrifices in safeguarding the security and
well-being of the Bhutanese nation. Showing true patriotism and dedication, they
had even risked their lives in several wars fought with the Tibetans and the
British to protect the sovereignty of the country,, and had passed down to their
future generations the proud legacy of a sovereign independent nation
with a unique national identity. For many generations, said the
members, the Kingdom of Bhutan had enjoyed peace, tranquility and happiness
through the blessings and protection of our Guardian Deities, the merits and
wisdom of our Kings and the good fortune, loyalty, dedication and unity of the
people.
The People's Representatives
pointed out that the Nepalese were recent immigrants who ha d come to work on
the land in the foothills of Bhutan.-. From the very beginning they had taken
advantage of the Royal Government by violating the laws of the land and bringing
in relatives and fellow Nepalese to settle illegally in Bhutan. They also
illegally occupied large tracts of government land and resorted to various means
such as illegal registration in census records to increase then Nepalese
population in southern Bhutan.
Despite these illegal actions on
their part, the Royal Government had always shown tolerance and generosity
towards the Nepalese in southern Bhutan. They were given more land than the
original Bhutanese and provided with employment and good economic opportunities.
Southern Bhutan was given preferential treatment in all development programmes
and the Southern Bhutanese enjoyed greater benefits in education and employment
in government service, including appointment to very senior and important posts.
At a time when the whole country
was fully involved in further promoting its development process for the greater
prosperity of the people, and when the nation was already beginning to reap
fruits of thirty years of development, government and people of Bhutan were
shocked and dismayed by the anti-national uprising in southern Bhutan. Starting
with the distribution of subversive literature in 1988, the anti-national
activities culminated with outright rebellion against the TSAWA-SUM in the 5
Dzongkhags and 1 Dungkhag of southern Bhutan in September-October, 1990.
The Assembly members' observed
the following pattern in the anti-national uprising:
a) Thee ngolops began by
viciously maligning the rich religious and cultural heritage of Bhutan. They
deliberately attacked the policy of national integration through the promotion
of Driglam Namzha and the national dress and language to create misunderstanding
between the people and the government, and communal discord among the people of
northern and southern Bhutan.
b)They tried to undermine the
excellent state of Indo-Bhutan relations through malicious allegations of
Indians being mistreated in Bhutan although the very baselessness of their
charges failed to win them any sympathy or support except from the local Nepali
population across the border. They also tried to win international sympathy and
support for their activities by making wild allegations of human rights
violation by the Royal Government.
c)At the same time, the ngolops
started terrorist activities that began with threats, extortion and robbery but
soon graduated to kidnappings, rape and murder. They destroyed many basic
service facilities in southern Bhutan such as schools, hospitals and bridges
built at great cost by the government for the benefit of the Southern Bhutanese
themselves. They totally disregarded the fact that the government had developed
more service facilities in southern Bhutan than in any other part of the
country.
d) After the violent uprising in
the 5 Dzongkhags, and I Dungkhag of southern Bhutan last year, the
anti-nationals continued to carry out large scale acts of terrorism and had not
relented in their efforts to destabilise the country and achieve their
subversive goals.
As the anti-nationals in southern
Bhutan had shown their total lack of appreciation for everything the Royal
Government had done for them and were instead bent on subverting the future
security and well-being of the TSA-WA-SUM, the National Assembly deliberated on
the, following proposals to remove the ngolop problem once and for all.
1. Eviction of
ngolops
Twenty proposals on the
eviction of anti-nationals were put forth by the representatives of 79
gewogs from the Dzongkhags of Samdrupjongkhar, Haa, Tongsa, Tashigang, Samchi,
Chirang, Sarbhang, Dagana and Mongar, and the representatives of the Monk Body
and the Bhutan Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
The People's Representatives of
Haa, Tongsa and Tashigang proposed that all individuals involved anti-national
activities should be evicted from the country. Other members proposed that so
some distinction should be made as all Southern Bhutanese would not
anti-nationals. In this regard one of the Royal Advisory Councillors from
southern Bhutan requested that only those who were involved in anti-national
activities be evicted and their relatives dealt with as per the Law of' the
Land.
However, most members held the
view that no distinction should be made whatsoever and that all Southern
Bhutanese should be evicted. They also recommended that this should be
applicable to all Southern Bhutanese working in the government and even to those
Southern Bhutanese married to original Bhutanese. The Chimis of Samdrupjongkhar
and Haa proposed d that even if one individual from a house hold was involved in
anti-national activities, the whole family should be evicted including those in
government service.
The People's Representative from Chirang proposed
that if a head of a family absconded from the Country and was found to have
joined the anti-nationals, the names of all his family members should struck off
the Census Records, , and the family evicted and their property confiscated by
the government. He stated that such an action was required as otherwise there
was every possibility of the ngolop's family members supporting the
anti-nationals. In the event that members of the household, other than the head
of the family, absconded from the country, he proposed that only the names of
the persons concerned should be removed from the census and their property
confiscated as the other family members could still be loyal citizens.
The Chimi from Sarbhang Dzongkha stated that if
the head of the family was \involved in anti-national activities, the whole
family should be evicted. IF such severe actions were not taken, anti-national
activities would continue. This would not only endanger the life and property of
the local people but also pose a great threat to the security and stability of
the country.
In this regard, the People's
Representative from Sibsoo Dungkhag expressed his deep disappointment and
disgust at the fact that many people who had been educated by the government at
great cost, and even sent for higher studies abroad and given important
positions in the government, had joined the anti-nationals instead of showing
appreciation and gratitude to the government These people had not only attempted
to create misunderstanding between the government and the public but had also
tried to destroy the excellent relations between Bhutan and its neighboring
countries. As such, it had become impossible for the loyal citizens of southern
Bhutan to tolerate the activities of such people. The public were, therefore,
ready to fight these anti-nationals and requested the government to grant
permission to the loyal citizens to fight them. He also reported that the family
members of many anti-nationals were still in the country and mingled freely with
the loyal citizens. He said that such inter-actions were not desirable as it
would have many adverse effects. The presence of such people were also making it
difficult for the government and local officials to have free and frank
discussions during public meetings as the relatives of the anti-nationals
attending these meetings were supplying information to the ngolops. The People's
Respresentadve of Sibsoo, therefore, proposed that all family members of
anti-nationals should be evicted from the country.
The People's Representatives from
Tsangkhar Gewog of Dagana Dzongkhag submitted that the anti-national uprising in
southern Bhutan had hampered all development in the country. He stated that he
could not understand how people like R.B. Basnet, ex-Managing Director of the
State Trading Corporation of Bhutan and Bhim Subba, ex-Director General of the
Power Department, in whom His Majesty the King had reposed full trust and
confidence, could misappropriate government funds on such a large scale and seek
political asylum in Nepal. He also failed to understand how the Nepalese
Government could provide support to such corrupt officials and suggested that in
line with this action, the Government of Nepal should be requested to takeover
all the other anti-nationals in the country.
Likewise, the member from
Dagapela Dungkhag stated that the uprising in southern Bhutan in
September - October last year had posed a grave threat to the security of
the country. He too expressed his inability to understand how the Southern
Bhutanese who had been provided with good land and all the all the
benefits of development could turn against the TSA-WA-SUM. He proposed that all
Southern Bhutanese who had taken part in the demonstrations at Damphu and
Sunkosh along with those who had been collecting donations for the
anti-nationals should be evicted from the country. He assured the Assembly that
the public would extend full cooperation to the government in identifying all
such people. In the event, that these people were not evicted, they should be
punished strictly as per the Law of the Land, he said.
The People's Representative from
Chengmari submitted that until now people had not been in a position to oppose
the anti-nationals. As such, the government had to face great difficulties in
deploying security forces at considerable cost for ensuring the security of the
public. He said that the public had now taken a firm decision to protect
themselves from the and-nationals as they had suffered considerably and had
realized that the anti-nationals were the enemies of the people. Therefore, the
public were firm in their desire to get rid of all the anti-nationals from their
Dungkhag. The loyal citizens of Chengmari Dungkhag, he said, had no feelings of
love and compassion for the anti-nationals and their families. The people,
therefore, requested the government to allow the public to evict the
anti-nationals and their families from the Dungkhag. The representative said
that for security reasons, the people also requested for permission to regroup
their villages together after evicting the anti-nationals and their families.
The Home Minister expressed his
appreciation for the proposal of the People's Representatives from Sibsoo,
Chengmari and Dagapela that henceforth the public would on their own identify
the anti-nationals and evict them from the country. Regarding the regrouping of
villages he stated that was no need to obtain separate permission to do so as
people were free to construct houses on their own land. However, he reminded
them that in order to facilitate the protection of fives and properties of the
Southern Bhutanese people, a circular seeking cooperation of the people to
provide timely information on anti-national activities to the security forces
had been issued but that so far no useful information or cooperation had been
given by the public.
At this juncture, many
representatives expressed grave doubts over the statements made by the Southern
Bhutanese representatives condemning the anti-nationals. They cited examples of
similar statements being made by the then representatives of southern Bhutan
during the 68th and 69th Sessions of the National Assembly. They said that most
of the previous representatives had absconded and joined the anti-nationals.
They, therefore, demanded that the representatives from southern Bhutan should
make their positions very clear with regard to the punishment and eviction of
anti-nationals and the methodologies thereof.
In this regard, several
Government Representatives brought the attention of the Assembly to the
nondiscriminatory policy of His Majesty the King towards all his subjects
despite the anti-national uprising that had taken place in southern Bhutan.
Although they recognized that it would not be in keeping with His Majesty's
magnanimous policy, these representatives felt that the time had now come to
identify the anti-nationals and evict them from the country. Under the
circumstances prevailing in southern Bhutan, the government should now act
on the recommendations made by the representatives of the people, they said.
His Majesty the King was pleased
to recognise that the representatives of the government, Dratshang and the
public had brought up the proposal of evicting the anti-nationals with the
objective of safeguarding the security and well-being of the country. His
Majesty, however, pointed out that it would not be fair or useful at this stage
to press the representatives of the southern Dzongkhags to come up with a firm
proposal on the question of identifying anti-nationals and recommending suitable
punishments for them. It would be more appropriate if the representatives of
southern Bhutan were directed by the Assembly to submit their proposal on this
issue during the next Session of the National Assembly after holding extensive
consultations and discussions with all the people in the 56 gewogs of southern
Bhutan and obtaining their views and recommendations.
One of the Royal Advisory
Councillors from southern Bhutan expressed his deep appreciation to His Majesty
the King for once again considering the issue compassionately. He thanked His
Majesty for giving the representatives an opportunity to consult the public on
the identification of anti-nationals and punishment recommended for them,
including eviction, and then submitting their proposals to the 71st Session of
the National Assembly.
The People's Representatives from
Pemagatshel, Punakha, Tashi Yangtse and Bumthang while respecting the suggestion
made by His Majesty the King, stated that by and large they had lost faith in
the people of southern Bhutan and that delaying decisions on the punishment and
eviction of anti-nationals might not be in the best interest of the country.
In conclusion, the National
Assembly resolved, as recommended by His Majesty the King, that the public of
the five Dzongkhags and one Dungkhag covering the 56 gewogs of southern Bhutan
would submit a comprehensive Genja (written and signed undertaking) to the 71st
Session of the National Assembly on the punishment, including eviction, that
should be awarded to the anti-nationals involved in ngolop activities.
2. Application of
the Law against the ngolops
The People's Representatives of
59 gewogs in the Dzongkhags of Paro, Punakha, Samdrupjongkhar, Chirang, Lhuntshi,
Chukha, Tashigang, Pemagatshel, Thimphu and Dagana presented 16 points as listed
in the Agenda on the subject of imposing strict punishment on the ngolops
without any relaxation of the Law. They argued that the ngolops had committed
many criminal acts aimed at destroying the peace, security and well-being of the
peace loving Bhutanese people. They had caused irreparable damage and loss to
both the government and people by destroying many basic service facilities 1ike,
schools, hospitals, bridges and roads that had been established by the Royal
Government for the benefit of the people. They had deprived the people of their
sense of security over life and property through their relentless acts of
robbery, rape, abduction, murder and barbaric terrorism. .
They pointed out that had the
ngolops been brought before jus6ce they would have been found guilty of crimes
deserving capital punishment in many cases and life imprisonment in most others.
Yet, on purely compassionate and humanitarian grounds, His Majesty the King and
the Royal Government had granted amnesty to many of the ngolops who were still
unrepentant. Instead of being grateful and living peacefully as loyal citizens,
they had abused the amnesty and rejoined the ngolops in their terrorist
activities. The representatives, therefore, demanded that, in order to fully
eliminate the anti-national activities, the Thrimshung Chhenpo (Law of Bhutan)
should be applied strictly and that no farther amnesties should be granted.
The Royal Advisory Councillors
and many other representatives of the people and government officials stated
that Bhutan was a country where every subject was equal before the Law and the
King and the Law and that the Bhutanese had always been law abiding citizens
with each citizen contributing his/her share to the peace and stability of the
country. Leaving aside the inconceivable crime of treason against the TSA-WA-SUM,
every Bhutanese guilty of the smallest infractions of the law had always been
certain of just punishment, be it a case of petty theft, slander or
falsification. They maintained that the crimes of the ngolops were clearly aimed
at destroying the country's socioeconomic infrastructure, sowing seeds of
sedition and causing communal violence in our harmonious society. It was with
such intentions that the ngolops had unleashed a spate of terrorism mixed with
common robbery and shameless, inflammatory propaganda against the people of
Bhutan aid the spiritual and political -purity of the country.
The Chimis of Sephu, Kashi,
Darkar, Talo and Nawang under Wangdiphodrang Dzongkhag voiced their inner
sentiments and declared that until now, not only had a single ngolop criminal
not been subjected to capital punishment or even life imprisonment, but that it
had greatly disheartened and saddened the people to see that while the law was
applied fully to loyal and law abiding citizens it was not being applied to the
ngolops. They appealed that in the larger interest of the nation, the laws of
the land should be strictly applied in all cases, and that the ngolops should be
punished severely in accordance with their individual crimes without conceding
any form of relaxation.
The People's Representative of
Chirang took the floor at this point and expressed the deep gratitude of the
people of Chirang Dzongkhag for the clemencies granted to the Lhotshampas, and
submitted that, henceforth anyone guilty of inciting the people with the intent
of bringing harm upon the TSA-WA-SUM should suffer capital punishment without
benefit of clemency while all those who participated in any anti-national
activity should be sentenced to life imprisonment.
Other Chimis joined in the
deliberations by proposing that the few core ngolops who were under detention
should not enjoy the pleasure of free food and lodging at government cost, but
that they should be put to socially productive use through employment in
activities such as road construction. Several representatives recommended that
while all the ngolops must be brought before justice without exception. any
Southern Bhutanese found guilty of impersonation or falsification of census
records should be punished per the national Citizenship Act just like any other
Bhutanese in other regions.
Many members drew attention to
the growing public opinion that, inspite of there being a penalty/punishment for
every category of crime in accordance 'with the Law of Bhutan, the Royal
Government had not taken any action against the ngolops for their treacherous
crimes. They felt that the laws against treason only existed in writing as the
punishments were not being implemented by the government. They observed that
there were many people who believed that the continued anti-national activities
were a direct out come of the government's weakness in applying the Law. They,
therefore, stated that it was imperative to apply the law firmly against any
person guilty of unlawful actions against the TSA-WA-SUM.
Having taken the floor at this
juncture, the Home Minister recalled that, with regard to the views and opinions
of the members on the subject of punishing the ngolops as per the law, the Home
Ministry had clearly briefed the Assembly during its 69th Session on the reasons
why His Majesty the King had granted clemency to the ngolops. He announced that,
although it had been resolved then that the ngolops should be dealt with in
Accordance with the Law of Bhutan, His Majesty the King had been pleased to
grant clemency five times, covering a total of 813 ngolops since then.
The Minister explained that His
Majesty the King had ,granted amnesty keeping in mind the long term interest of
the country's peace and security and that it was-not done merely on
compassionate and humanitarian grounds. He clarified that it was in keeping with
the articles under OM-A-HUNG in the preamble of the Law of Bhutan that His
Majesty exercised the sovereign prerogative of granting clemency. He, therefore,
declared that there was no reason why His Majesty the King should not continue
to grant clemencies/pardons as and when His Majesty deemed it appropriate.
The Foreign Minister and the
Minister of Social Services and Communications stated that, among other reasons,
His Majesty the King had acted in the interest of Bhutan's image and that His
Majesty had also consulted with the many officials and Royal Advisory
Councillors, who were members of the National assembly as well as the Cabinet on
the subject of granting amnesty. They added that the provisions in the Law of
Bhutan as clarified by the Home Minister were well known to every member and
that they fully respected the exercise of this sovereign prerogative on the
basis of merit and justifications.
In response, the representatives
were unanimous in submitting that they had never harboured the slightest doubt
in the actions of His Majesty the King from the very beginning and that they
would continue to support wholeheartedly all the actions and decisions taken by
His Majesty for the well-being of the country. They further submitted that the
evil and treacherous actions of the ngolops had greatly disturbed their minds
and caused such anguish that they had to take the opportunity to clear their
deep concerns, especially their conviction that subjection of a few ngolops to
the severest form of lawful punishment would have a sobering and pacifying
effect on all other anti-nationals in southern Bhutan.
At this point, one of the Royal
Advisory Councillors from southern Bhutan conveyed the deepest gratitude of the
Lhotshampas for the unconditional clemencies that were being granted even though
the law, as enacted in 1959, and covering the imposition of severe punishment
for activities against the TSAWA-SUM, was clearly enshrined in article 17 and
section 1 to 11 of the Law of Bhutan. He went on to submit his personal view on
the subject of punishment for ngolops by recommending that those found guilty
should be given a prison term between one year to 10 years or 14 years depending
on the degree of their crime.
Several members entered the
debate to warn that then ngolops, upon availing clemency, were returning to
their villages and inciting the people and fanning regional and communal
feelings by insinuating that the Royal Government indulged in discrimination.
They maintained that such attempts had been made by the anti-nationals from the
very beginning and feared that their capacity to do so may have been unwittingly
strengthened by the government They pressed for firm and severe measures on the
Lhotshampa community before the problem assumed larger and more dangerous
proportions.
The Chimis from Pemagatshel, Mongar and Dagana
reiterated the fact that even under normal circumstances, even the most minor
offence brought a just punishment upon perpetrator, irrespective of whether the
case was decided at the lowest court of law, the High Court or on appeal even by
His Majesty the King. They stated that it was incumbent upon them as
representatives of the people to obtain clarifications in the National Assembly
on why the ngolops who had committed the vilest crime of high treason against
the TSA-WA-SUM enjoyed clemency. Convinced of the wisdom of the ancient adage
which advised that "a fire should be snuffed out before it becomes an
inferno" and to "rid the infant enemy before he became a menacing
giant", they urged that, for the security, the country should not hesitate
to let the sword of justice fall on the neck that carried the' devil's head.
His Majesty the King expressed
his understanding and respect for the position of the people and the convergence
of perceptions and opinions, of all the members on the issue under discussion.
There was good reason behind their request to the Royal Government to punish the
ngolops in strict accordance with the Law of Bhutan upon their being found
guilty. However, if the people all truly believed that it was imperative to not
only overcome the current problem from the ngolops but to prevent from ever
surfacing again to haunt posterity, His Majesty asserted that it was essential
that the people reposed in him their full trust and confidence and the total
responsibility to achieve this end. The willingness of the people to understand
and accept the reasons for granting amnesty to ngolops in future, should the
cause arise, would help substantially in the pursuit of the ultimate solution.
His Majesty confirmed that the granting of clemency to the 813 ngolops had not
been an act of compassion or humanitarian persuasion alone, but a decision that
was inspired by his deep-seated commitment to uproot the very cause of
the current problem so that the peace, security and sovereignty of the Palden
Drukpa would never again be threatened.
The representatives of the people
responded that the ultimate burden, of responsibility for ensuring Bhutan's
security and sovereignty had always rested fully on the strong and capable
shoulders of His Majesty the King. They offered their deepest gratitude to His
Majesty for his heart warming assurances and for assuming the full
responsibility of bringing about a lasting solution to the ngolop
problem. Towards this end, the people offered their unwavering and unconditional
support to His Majesty the King.
Upon the conclusion of the
lengthy deliberations on the subject of applying the law of the Land strictly to
the ngolops and the granting of amnesty, the National Assembly noted that the
ngolops had rot only abused the trust, compassion and magnanimity of the King
and the People, but had, without any cause and provocation, committed many
treacherous crimes of treason against the TSA-WA-SUM. The Assembly resolved that
the Royal Government should bring these criminals and terrorists to justice and
award them the severest form of punishment including life imprisonment and
capital punishment. In doing so, due weightage and consideration must be given
to the long term security and well-being of the country as well as to the Law of
the Land and the resolutions of the National Assembly.
On thee subject of granting
amnesty, it was unanimously resolved by all the representatives of the Clergy,
the Government and the People, that His Majesty the King should continue to
exercise the sovereign prerogative of granting clemency as enshrined in the Law
of Bhutan in its preamble under the articles,OM-A-HUNG.
3. Extradition of
ngolops and discussion with neighbouring countries on this point.
The people's representatives of
43 gewogs from the Dzongkhags of Thimphu, Tashigang, Wangdiphodrang, Bumthang,
Lhuntshi, Pemagatshel, Punakha, Dagana, Haa and Chukha, and the representatives
of the Monk Body and the Bhutan Chamber of Commerce and Industry categorically
stated that the anti-nationals who had run away to India and Nepal should be
extradited and that the matter should be taken up with the neighbouring
countries concerned to minimise the problems brought about by these ngolops.
Eighteen proposals in this regard
were put forth. The members pointed out that the anti-nationals and their
supporters had turned against the TSA-WA-SUM and were working on destabilizing
the Government. They said that most of these anti-nationals were people who had
been educated by the government and given preferential treatment in employment
and promotions and that some of them had been trusted senior officials. Instead
of being grateful to their King, Government and Country, the had risen against
the TSA-WA-SUM, and the country on the pretext of the government having adopted
discriminatory policies on religion, language, customs and tradition. From their
bases outside the country the anti-nationals had been continuously carrying out
robbery, arson, kidnapping, murder and other terrorist activities.
The People's Representatives felt
that since the anti-nationals were operating from outside the country, such acts
could even affect the good relations with the neighbouring countries.
In view of these considerations,
the representatives strongly felt that the Royal Government should hold
discussions with the governments of the countries where these and-nationals were
taking shelter and make efforts to atleast extradite the leaders of the
anti-nationals. Many Chimis were unanimous in expressing the need to
particularly extradite R.B.Basnet ad Bhim Subba, of STCB and the department of
Power respectively, for trial as per the Laws of the Land.
Some members, while fully
recognising the excellent state of Indo-Bhutan relations, expressed doubts on
the effectiveness of the extradition agreement between the two countries. The
Chimis from Wangdiphodrang, Punakha and Tashigang said they were disturbed by
the support extended to the anti-nationals by the local Nepali population across
the border as these people might even attempt to damage the excellent relations
between the two neighbouring countries. Other members proposed that the
Government of India should be requested to ensure that the anti-nationals did
not carry out terrorist activities against Bhutan from their soil.
Similarly, members from Lhuntshi,
Pemagatshel and Bumthang felt that, if necessary, Bhutan as a member of SAARC
should take ,up the extradition of the anti-nationals during SAARC meetings with
the governments concerned.
In response, the Foreign Minister
expressed appreciation for die concern shown by the public for the security of
the country. He said that Indo-Bhutan friendship had been growing from strength
to strength over the years and this close relationship had reached new heights
during His Majesty's reign. He also said that regard to the problems posed by
the anti-nationals, the Royal Government had been receiving total support and
sympathy from Central Government in India. The Chief Minister of West Bengal had
also assured the Royal Government that he would not allow the anti-nationals to
carry out terrorist operations against Bhutan from their soil and had made this
position publicly known through the Indian newspapers.
Despite India's big population
and innumerable internal problems and the problem of distinguishing the Southern
Bhutanese and-nationals from the Nepalese people of Darjeeling, Kalimpong and
the Duars. the Indian Police had apprehended some of the anti-nationals and
recovered a number of vehicles hijacked by them. The Indian Police in Assam and
West Bengal had extended their full cooperation and support. Frequent
consultations at the district level were also being held between the
representatives of the West Bengal Government and the Royal Government to
discuss issues related to the anti-national problem.
The Foreign Minister further
clarified the doubts expressed by some of the People's Representatives on the
anti-nationals operating from Indian soil. He stated that in view of the close
relationship between the two countries there had always been close understanding
and mutual support for each other. He stated that he had no doubt whatsoever Of
receiving India's full and continued support in tackling the anti-national
problem. He said that though there was an Extradition Treaty between Bhutan and
India, while implementing it there were some problems due to procedural
formalities which had to be carried out. The two governments were working
towards overcoming these problems.
The Minister also said that
Bhutan being a signatory to the SAARC Regional Convention on the Suppression of
Terrorism had to enact a legislation on the Suppression of terrorism and also to
enact a Bhutan Extradition Act. These two Acts, if passed by the National
Assembly when put forth by the Ministry of Home Affairs, would greatly
facilitate the extradition of criminals and terrorists.
The Foreign Minister stated that
in the past there had never been any problems in relations between Bhutan and
Nepal However, as the members might be aware, the anti-nationals who had
absconded from the country and sought asylum in Nepal had received the full
support of the political parties and people of Nepal. As suck he felt that it
would be difficult to extradite these anti-nationals and also to recover the
money and property stolen by them.
The Chief Operations Officer of
the Royal Bhutan Army, Goongleon Gongma Lam Dorji stated that the
representatives of the public need not be concerned about Indo-Bhutan relations.
From the Army's point of view, the Government of India despite their own
problems, had extended full cooperation and generous assistance to Bhutan.
Security was being provided to Bhutanese officials and the public traveling
through Indian territory. Incidents of robbery and hijacking of vehicles had
taken place now and then because the drivers or owners of these vehicles had
failed to inform the Royal Bhutan Police about their movement and, therefore,
security by the Indian Police could not be arranged. He said that the
cooperation and friendship between the Indian Army and the Royal Bhutan Army was
excellent, and that the Indian Army was providing generous and valuable
financial and logistic assistance to the Royal Bhutan Army. He also expressed
his deep appreciation for the valuable assistance rendered to the RBA by IMTRAT.
Many representatives expressed
their happiness with the excellent state of Indo-Bhutan relations and their
appreciation for the assistance and support provided by the Government of India
with regard to the ngolop problem. They also expressed their hope that this
support would be continued in the future. They felt that though India was a big
and powerful country and Bhutan a small neighbour, the excellent relations
between the two countries was a model of good neighbourliness and friendship in
inter-state relations.
Many members expressed their deep
appreciation for the unwavering support provided by the Government of India at
this critical time in Bhutan's history.
His Majesty the King proposed
that the National Assembly should adopt a resolution recognizing the unfailing
support which India had extended to Bhutan at a crucial time and express the
Assembly's deep appreciation to the government and people of India for their
staunch friendship, goodwill and cooperation.
Thereafter, the representative of
Wangdiphodrang stated that throughout history there had never been any problems
between Nepal and Bhutan and since Bhutan had helped Nepal in its times of
trouble in the past, he felt that the government should request, for the
extradition of R.B. Basnet and Bhim Subba. Others felt that rather than
extraditing the to officials, it might be better to recover the money and
property stolen by them through a court of law.
The Finance Minister stated that
R.B. Basnet and Bhim Subba had planned to abscond from the country for some time
and therefore flagrantly stolen considerable amounts of money from the
government. He stated that it was immediately after the Royal Audit issued
notifications for the auditing of the STCB and the Department of Power, that R.B.
Basnet and Bhim Subba had absconded from the country. Subsequently, when the
auditing started, and fearing detection, a large number of other Southern
Bhutanese officials from these departments also absconded. In order to make
detection difficult they had deliberately not maintained the accounts properly.
Writing pads, cash receipts and cash memos of 19 outside firms had been found in
their offices and residence. The auditing was yet to be completed but the
preliminary report showed that R.B.Basnet had stolen money, misused authority
and, committed other serious irregularities that brought about a loss of-over
Nu.50 million to the Government. Similarly, Bhim Subba also stolen money and
committed irregularities bringing about a loss of over Nu.30 million to the
government. Between the two of them, they had brought about a loss of over
Nu.80million to the government The Finance Minister stated that in his opinion
the Royal Government should take all possible steps to recover the stolen funds.
Thereafter, some members stated
that the anti-nationals had been consistently accusing the Royal Government of
violating human rights. They questioned whether act- of robbery, arson,
kidnapping, murder, torture, rape and stealing money in terms of millions was in
keeping with human rights. They stated that these crimes should be widely
publicized by the government.
In this regard, the Minister of
Trade and Industries stated that His Majesty the King had reposed full trust in
R.B.Basnet and Bhim Subba and had not only promoted them but had also given them
charges of important Departments. As stated in the Finance Minister's report
they had brought about huge losses to the government and as such the Foreign
Ministry should work on extraditing them even if there was no extradition treaty
between Nepal and Bhutan. While he was not aware of the reasons for the Nepalese
Government supporting these two officials, it was clear that they had absconded
as criminal and not on political grounds. As such, every step should be taken to
extradite them. If this was not possible they should be charged in a court of
law.
Many members repeated that the
anti-nationals led by R.B.Basnet and Bhim Subba had, instead of being grateful
to the country, turned against the TSA-WA-SUM and brought about huge losses
amounting to over Nu.30 million to the government and people of Bhutan. As such,
the Royal Government, in consultation with the Nepalese Government, should work
on extraditing these officials and punishing them as per the Laws of the Land.
Many members felt that if no
action was taken against these officials despite their serious crimes, there
would be a great risk of many more such cases taking place and huge losses
inflicted to the government and people of Bhutan. Therefore, it was important to
take all necessary measures to extradite the two criminals and try them in a
court of law. If the Nepalese Government knew that these officials had absconded
as criminals and not on political grounds, there would be no reason for them not
to hand these criminals over to the Royal Government. As such, it was suggested
that the Royal Government should take immediate action to pursue the matter with
the Nepalese Government.
The People's Representatives from
Dagana, Shemgang and Chukha questioned how it could have been possible for the
government too allow such large scale corruption by Bhim Subba and R.B. Basnet
to go undetected.
At this juncture, the Foreign
Minister said that it was very important for all the members to be aware of the
true intentions and objectives of the anti-nationals. The anti-national
activities, he said, were not launched because of the national policy on dress,
language, custom and religion. These issues were used only as propaganda to
malign the Royal Government and to gain international sympathy and support. The
anti-nationals had a much more deep-seated, long term objective. Not satisfied
that they were already a large minority, they were continuously repeating that
the Nepalese in Bhutan comprised 52 to6O percent of the population and,
therefore, the Nepalese constituted the majority of the population.
Simultaneously, they were calling for the introduction of multi-party democracy.
Their strategy was that once democracy was introduced they would be in a
position to form the government in Thimphu and take over the county. They,
therefore, wanted to rapidly increase their demographic size through illegal
immigration. As such, he said it was not difficult to understand why the
Southern Bhutanese were always finding different ways and means of bringing
illegal of Nepali immigrants into the country and why their population had been
increasing by leaps and bounds.
To give the historical
background, Sikkim which was immediately east of Nepal strongly opposed
induction of Nepalese settlers. The British, however, forcibly brought Nepalese
settlers into Sikkim for their own political reasons. In no time the Nepali
population increased through high birth rate and through regular immigration
from Nepal and soon they formed 80% of the population. Today, as everyone is
aware, Sikkim is governed by the Nepalese majority and the original Sikkimese
people are a small minority in their own country.
In Darjeeling, Kurseong and
Kalimpong, which are further east of Sikkim, Nepalese labourer were brought in
by the British to work in the tea plantations. The Nepalese population in these
areas increased rapidly and to-day the Nepalese population was totally dominates
the tiny indigenous population of Lepchas and Sikkimese. The eastward migration
of the Nepalese, actively encouraged by the British spread to the foothills of
Bhutan and the Bengal Duars and further eastwards to India's northeast region of
Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Nagaland.
It was net merely out of ethnic
affinity that the political parties and people of Nepal were supporting the
anti-nationals of southern Bhutan, but more out of their deep-seated desire to
promote the concept of a Greater Nepal. This concept envisaged Nepalese
domination over the entire Himalayas by bringing Bhutan. parts of the Duars in
West Bengal and Assam and the states of Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram
and Nagaland under Nepalese control just as in the case of Sikkim and
Darjeeling.
In view of this, the Foreign
Minister said, it was far more important to understand the deeper implications
of the anti-national problem and the threat to the nation rather than to
concentrate on peripherial issues like the extradition of a few ngolops or the
recovery of stolen money. That was why, the Minister said, it was necessary to
ensure that the ngolop problem was removed once and. for all if Bhutan is to
remain a sovereign, independent country. It was, therefore, of paramount
importance that the government and the people joined hands under to His Majesty
the King's leadership to remove ngolop problem once and for all. If His
Majesty's farsighted policies on the ngolop problem was given unstinted support
by the people, a permanent solution was possible.
The representatives thanked the
Foreign Minister for highlighting the long-term aims and objectives of the
anti-nationals. Many members, however, insisted that since there were no
problems with the Government of Nepal, the Royal Government should at least work
on extraditing R.B.Basnet and Bhim Subba, as they had committed serious crimes,
even if the other anti - nationals could not be extradited. Other members
insisted that even if the Royal Government was not able to extradite them. legal
action should be initiated against these criminals in a court of law.
The National Assembly decided
that though the extradition of the two officials and other anti-nationals
leaders from Nepal was not important for the national security, it was essential
to make every effort to bring them back since they had committed serious crimes
in the country, and that they be tried and punished as per the Law. In the event
this was not possible, legal proceedings should be initiated against them.
Towards this the Foreign Ministry should take up the matter with its
counterparts in the the Nepalese Government.
4. Holding of
Important Posts and Sensitive Responsibilities by Lhotshampas
Thee representatives of 30 gewogs
from the Dzongkhags of Tongsa, Thimphu, Haa, Bumthang, Paro, Lhuntshi and
Tashigang, and the representatives of the Monk Body and the Bhutan Chamber of
Commerce and Industry submitted nine proposals recommending that Southern
Bhutanese officials should no longer be appointed to important posts or
entrusted with sensitive responsibilities.
In March 1990, during the 69th
Session of the National Assembly. the representatives of the people of southern
Bhutan in the Royal Advisory Council and in the National Assembly had submitted
that the anti-national uprising in southern Bhutan was instigated by
non-nationals and a few misguided anti-national elements, and that the general
public were not even aware of such activities. They had said that the people of
southern Bhutan had been greatly distressed and shamed by the anti-national
activities and had sought forgiveness from the Royal Government. They had given
their complete and full assurance that such subversive activities would riot
take place again. However from September 1990 onwards, large members of Southern
Bhutanese people had revolted violently against the TSA-WA-SUM.
In view of this. the members
submitted that the people could no longer trust the Southern Bhutanese. They
stated that the Royal Government had not only educated the Southern Bhutanese
officials but had also employed them in the Civil Service in important
positions. In return, these ungrateful officials had betrayed the trust reposed
in them and taken up anti-national activities against TSA-WA-SUM. It would,
therefore, not be in the national interest to retain the services of such
people. The representatives proposed that all Southern Bhutanese officials
should, therefore, be relieved from government service.
In this regard Chimis from
Tashigang and Bumthang suggested that the immediate family members and relatives
of anti-nationals in government service should all be relieved from service.
Others proposed that only those government servants from southern Bhutan who
were loyal and had no connections with the ngolops should be allowed to continue
in service.
In this regard, the Secretary of
the Royal Civil Service Commission reported that the Commission shared the
concerns of the members on having Southern Bhutanese officials in the Civil
Service under the present circumstances. Today, he stated, out of 12,023 civil
servants, 5,383 (39.23%) were Southern Bhutanese. In the past six years, out of
213 students sponsored for further studies in India alone, 127 (60%) were from
southern Bhutan. He went on to say that the government had educated these people
with the hope that they would serve the government and the people with loyalty
and devotion. The disappointment and the public were therefore understandable as
the main leaders and participants in the anti-national activities were
ex-civil servants. Till date, 349 Civil Servants had absconded and 26 Forest
Guards and 99 Police and Army personnel had deserted and joined the ngolops.
During May, 1991, 10 senior Southern Bhutanese officials had absconded, and as
all the members were aware, most of them had sought asylum in Nepal, said the
Secretary.
The Secretary of the RCSC
submitted to National Assembly that the Commission had always had one uniform
policy for all Bhutanese citizens aid as such had provided equal opportunities
to all citizens in their training, appointments and promotions in the civil
service. Despite the uprising in southern Bhutan, the Royal Government had not
resorted to any discriminatory measures against the Southern Bhutanese civil
servants. All that the Commission had done was to introduce the requirement of a
Police clearance for processing training, appointments and promotions. This was
applicable equally to all Bhutanese and was felt necessary in order to prevent
people having direct connection with terrorists and ngolops from being appointed
to sensitive posts.
However, while following this
non-discriminatory policy, the government had to face considerable risks and
embarrassment both at home and abroad. Students sent for studies abroad had
turned against the government and in some cases had sought political asylum in
the host countries. Despite these risks and embarrassments, the Royal Civil
Service commission had still not changed its policy nor had it received any
directives from the government to do so. This, he said, reflected the very
patient and tolerant stand taken by the Royal Government towards the Lhotshampas
under the benevolent leadership of His Majesty the King.
However, as of now, this
non-discriminatory policy had not been beneficial as could be seen from the
involvement of a large number of civil servants in anti-national activities, the
Secretary said.
The Secretary also submitted that
it was now becoming increasingly difficult for the Royal Civil Service
Commission to give employment to Lhotshampas as the employing agencies were
reluctant to accept Lhotshampas. This situation had been further aggravated
after senior officials like Bhim Subba and R.B.Basnet, with their subordinates
and colleagues had absconded from the country. The government agencies were also
becoming reluctant to process the training of Lhotshampas as they were beginning
to doubt the wisdom of such investments, it was becoming in increasingly more
difficult to obtain their support in appointing and training Lhotshampa civil
servants as they had become wary of further cases of betrayal of trust by the
Lhotshampas. Moreover, the Royal Civil Service Commission could not compel these
government agencies to employ, train or promote Lhotshampas, for if that was
done the agencies would hold the Commission responsible in case such officials
committed anti-national activities or financial irregularities and absconded
from the country.
The Home Minister stated that the
government officials fully shared the concern of the public in this regard.
While it was hoped that all Southern Bhutanese in government service would serve
with total loyalty, dedication and commitment it was no longer possible to gauge
or state with certainty how they would actually conduct themselves in the
future.
The members stated that in
keeping with the national policy of one country, one people, the Lhotshampas had
been given equal access to education, employment and appointments to important
posts. However, as the Lhotshampas had proved themselves untrustworthy, all
Lhotshampas in government service should be retired. While some members were of
the view that, no Southern Bhutanese should be given important responsibilities
nor appointed to sensitive posts including posts involving financial
transactions, others expressed the need to undertake thorough screening before
Southern Bhutanese officials were promoted as otherwise there was every
possibility of further abuses of trust and confidence bring repeated. Though the
government had incurred great cost in educating and training the Southern
Bhutanese officials and had conferred special treatment on them, they had shown
no appreciation and gratitude whatsoever.
The Chimis from Thimphu, Paro and
the Representative of the Bhutan Chamber of Commerce and Industry expressed the
need to stop further employment of Southern Bhutanese and that those already
employed should not receive any promotions until the anti-national problem was
removed.
At this point, His Majesty the
King was pleased to inform the members that the Royal Civil Service Commission
had full powers and authority for appointments into the civil service, training,
promotions and imposition of penalties on civil servants as per the Civil
Service Rules and Regulations. As such, His Majesty the King proposed that the
Royal Civil Service Commission should be given the responsibility to closely
study the issues raised by the representatives of the public and to make
necessary amendments in the Civil-, Service Rules and Regulations with the
objective of having an efficient and dedicated civil service to serve the
nation.
The Planning Minister informed
the National Assembly that although His Majesty the King was not a member, the
Royal Civil Service Commission consisted of Ministers, Representatives of the
Royal Advisory Council and Secretaries of the Ministries. While reconsidering
appointments of civil servants to various posts and promotions, the criteria
taken into consideration were qualification, experience, capability, dedication
and loyalty to the TSA-WA-SUM. There was no discrimination whatsoever on grounds
of race or creed. They informed the Assembly that the Commission was prepared to
make whatever amendments were necessary in the Civil Service Rules and
Regulations.
In response, the representatives
stated that the Southern Bhutanese had greatly harmed the national policy of one
nation, one people and that the Lhotshampas were responsible for dividing the
country into two peoples viz. the Nepalese immigrants and the original
inhabitants. The representatives deeply regretted the harm caused by the
Lhotshampas. They submitted that while the original and true Bhutanese would
always be loyal anti patriotic citizens, they now had serious reservations about
the Lhotshampas who were recent immigrants and had a totally different
outlook and concept of loyalty and dedication to the country. They requested the
Royal Civil Service commission to give serious consideration to, their proposals
regarding the employment of Southern Bhutanese in government service. The
Commission should not take their proposals as individual views but as the views
of the large numbers of the Bhutanese people who they represented in the
Assembly.
At this juncture, one of
the Royal Advisory Councillors of southern Bhutan stated that the tragic and
unexpected anti-national activities in southern Bhutan which had started from
1989, had brought about considerable worries and sufferings that had made all
Bhutanese citizens very concerned. The Agenda of the 70th Session of the
National Assembly rightly focused mainly on the anti-national uprising in
southern Bhutan. He went on to state that since the Royal Advisory
Councillors and People's Representatives from southern Bhutan had been silent
during the debate on the anti-national uprising, the members from different
parts of the country who were Concerned about the uprising might have
begun to doubt the position of the people of southern Bhutan.
He went on to say that the
statements made by the Royal Advisory Councillors and the representatives of the
public from southern Bhutan, as recorded in Resolution No.3 of the 69th Session
of the National Assembly, that all the anti-nationals were not Southern
Bhutanese had been proven incorrect by the mass anti-national demonstrations
carried Out by the Southern Bhutanese towards the end of 1990.
Moreover, as highlighted by the
resolutions of the 67th and 68th Sessions of the National Assembly, the public
of southern Bhutan had gone against their own declaration of support and loyalty
made to His Majesty the King during his tour of all the Dzongkhags in southern
Bhutan and his public meetings with representatives of every household in the
south. Contrary to their declaration, the people of southern Bhutan had carried
out unforgiveable acts against the country. He went on to say that in order to
find out what had prompted the people to carry out such acts, His Majesty had
conducted extensive tours of southern Bhutan during which he met villagers,
Village Elders, Village Headmen and National Assembly Members. In these meetings
His Majesty had explained at great length that for the sake of the security and
well-being of the country and the people, the Southern Bhutanese should not
allow themselves to be influenced by anti-national elements. It was a source of
deep sadness that despite His Majesty's advice, the anti-national activities in
southern Bhutan had continued to take place. It was indeed a well known fact
that the people of southern Bhutan chose not to pay heed to the benevolent
advise given by His Majesty and had carried out anti-national activities, the
Councillor said.
There was no denying that the
government had more than amply met the needs of the people on all fronts like
education. training, economic development building of schools, roads, bridges
etc. Nor could it be denied that the shocking act of betrayal and uprising
against the government had taken place in southern Bhutan. The people of
southern Bhutan, were trying to identify those responsible for the anti-national
uprising, which he said had greatly harmed the people themselves.
The Councillor also stated that
there was absolutely no reason for the people of southern Bhutan to resort to
such acts as there were established procedures and means to seek redressal for
any genuine grievances they had. The people were all aware of the redressal
system in the country and the Royal Advisory Councillors were in a position to
vouch for the existence of such systems. No grievance had been brought to the
notice of any authority and he expressed regret at the fact that no Southern
Bhutanese had even mentioned any grievances to him although he represented them
in the Royal Advisory Council. It was, therefore understandable why all the
members in the Assembly had been ambitious in repeatedly voicing then need to
identify the anti-nationals of southern Bhutan, he added.
He went on to say that His
Majesty the King had always shown compassion towards all his people and had been
deeply committed towards improving their well-being. He hoped that the
government and the people would continue to work together as before to safeguard
the country's security and to ensure that peace and unity was once again
restored. He said that he was deeply ashamed and regretted that the
anti-national uprising had taken place in southern Bhutan.
Although it was very difficult
for ordinary people to find a solution to the anti-national problem no matter
how hard they might try, he was confident that if all the people put their trust
and faith in His Majesty the King and extended their full support and loyalty, a
solution would be found by His Majesty and the security- and well-being of the
country would be fully, safeguarded.
Thereafter, since the members had
completed their submission of the views and concerns of the public to the
National Assembly, it was resolved that, as recommended by His Majesty the King,
and bearing in mind the present crisis in the country, and the concerns of the
people enumerated above, the Royal Civil Service Commission should closely study
the, policies pertaining to the civil service and revise and make amendments, if
found necessary, in the existing rules. The Assembly fully empowered the Royal
Civil Service Commission to introduce and implement rules in the Civil Service
Rules and Regulations that were considered necessary to ensure a reliable and
dependable civil service to serve the nation.
5.
Allotment of Illegal Excess Land in southern Bhutan
The People's Representatives of
45 gewogs in the Dzongkhags of Tongsa, Haa, Paro, Chukha, Lhuntshi, Tashigang,
Pemagatshel, Wangdiphodrang, Dagana and. Samdrupjongkhar submitted eleven
proposals on allotment of land in southern Bhutan to the poor and the landless
people from northern Bhutan.
The members proposed that the
land belonging to Southern Bhutanese who had absconded and joined the
anti-nationals and all categories of illegal land should be allotted to the poor
and landless people from northern Bhutan. Some members recommended that such
lands should be allotted to the retired personnel from the armed forces as many
of them were finding it extremely difficult to find employment after retirement
and were unable to stake claims to land-owned by their parents as most of the
land holdings were very small and not sufficient for distribution among the
children. Such resettlement programmes would also foster preservation of the
country's tradition, culture and customs thereby promoting national identity and
strengthening the security and sovereignty of the country.
The Chimis from thee Dzongkhags
of eastern Bhutan stated that there were many people who did not have sufficient
agricultural land and that many did not even own a plot of land to construct a
house. They requested that the illegal land in southern Bhutan and land
belonging to the ngolops should be allotted to the poor and landless people from
the northern Dzongkhags. Such a step would also ensure equitable distribution of
land and reduce the occurrence of anti-national activities.
The Secretary, Department of
Survey and Land Records reported to the Assembly that the cadastral survey of
the land holdings in Samchi and parts of Samdrupjongkhar had been recently
completed. He stated that in Samchi Dzongkhag alone, when the resurvey was
carried out in accordance with the 1979 Land Act, illegal land holdings of
47,235.67 acres had been detected. During January to June 1991, 208 surveyors
were engaged for the cadastral survey in Samchi, out of which 160 were Southern
Bhutanese. As per the Land Act, variations of 0.12 acres and 0.25 acres were
allowed for every acre of wet land and dry land respectively. If this Law had
been applied strictly, large tracts of, land would have had to be confiscated
and the people concerned penalized. However, His Majesty the King had been
pleased to command the regularization of genuine excess land holdings in
accordance' with Resolution No. 13 of the 5 8th Session of the National Assembly
which permitted registration of excess land without paying the cost, provided
the land in question was within the boundary recorded in the earlier land
record. In case the owner was unable to prove that the excess land was within
the boundary of his land holdings, the excess land would be registered in
his/her name provided the land holding of the particular household did not
exceed the national ceiling of 25 acres. However, as decided during the 60th
-Session of the National Assembly, all forest land illegally leased and used for
growing cash crops had been confiscated.
Though the Land Act permitted
land holdings of only 25 acres per household, in southern Bhutan many people
registered in the census under one household had been permitted to register land
in their names on the ground, that although listed as such in the census, they
were not members of the same household. This relaxation of the Land Act had
enabled many households to own land far in excess of the land ceiling of 25
acres.
The Secretary went on to report
that despite all these special considerations given by His Majesty to the people
of southern -Bhutan, Samchi Dzongkhag alone had over 47,000 acres of illegal
land holdings even after large areas of excess land were regularised under - the
above special allowances and considerations.
At this point the Home Minister
stated that even after the Royal Government had regularised all genuine excess
land detected during the resurvey as per the Land Act and the resolutions of the
National Assembly, the amount of illegal land found by the survey ran into tens-of
thousands of acres. Besides these illegal land holdings. the government would be
acquiring some land as some of the Southern Bhutanese were selling their land
and leaving the country. Some of these land would be handed over to the
Department of Forests for plantation and protection of the environment The
balance could be distributed to the security forces, militia volunteers and
landless and poor people. He reported that the Ministry of Home Affairs was
working on the procedures to be adopted for such allotments.
The Chimis from Haa, Punakh and
Tashi Yangtse submitted that the illegal land in southern Bhutan should be
allotted to ex-service personnel as this would contribute to the security of the
nation and the promotion of the national policy of one country. one people.
His Majesty the King, at this
point told the Assembly that despite the anti-national uprising and the large
scale terrorism and subversive activities unleashed by the ngolops, the 5
Dzongkhags and 1 Dungkhag of southern Bhutan had remained intact and secure
because of the loyalty and dedicated services of the security forces. He
proposed that the allotment of the illegal land to the security forces and
retired servicemen who were also apart of the rural population, would be a
fitting recognition of the important role played by the services forces and the
militia volunteers in safeguarding the security of the country.
One of the Royal Advisory
Councillors of southern Bhutan submitted that as in the case of Samchi
Dzongkhag, excess land holdings would also be detected in the other southern
Dzongkhags and requested the government to consider allotting these land to the
"Sukumbasis" of southern Bhutan. He also submitted that when resurvey
o the land holdings in the northern Dzongkhags were carried out excess land
holdings would probably be detected there also. He requested that resettlement
programmes be undertaken as per the resolution adopted in this regard during the
69th Session of the National Assembly-and allotment of excess land be made to
landless people of both northern and southern Bhutan.
The Home Minister submitted that
if any individual felt that his/her land had been forcibly or wrongly declared
as illegal by the surveyors, His Majesty the King had issued a Royal Command
that such aggrieved individuals could take the matter to the Dzongkhag Courts or
directly to the High Court. His Majesty had also commanded that if any
individual wanted to sell his/her land to the government and leave the country,
such transactions should be undertaken only upon submission of a statement from
the head of the household declaring Ms intention to sell the land and leave the
country. This statement must be made and attested in the presence of the Dzongda,
Thrimpon, Head of the local Police, Registration Officer, Dungpa, Gup (Village
Headman) and the National Assembly member concerned. The payment of the cost of
land must also be made to the individual in the presence of the above officials
and people's representatives. With regard to settlement of Southern Bhutanese in
northern Bhutan the implementation of such a programme would be considered only
after the present problem in southern Bhutan was resolved, bearing in mind the
overall national security, the Home Minister said. With regard to the term
"Sukumbasis", as per the previous session of the National Assembly and
as landless people or people with very small land holdings were found in all
parts of the country, the acceptable term was "Landless People" and
not "Sukumbasis".
Many People's Representatives
stated that the reason why such large illegal land holdings were being found
only in southern Bhutan was due to the large influx of illegal Nepalese migrants
and also due to convenient and easy leasing of illegal land holdings to
non-national share croppers. They recommended that the illegal land holdings in
southern Bhutan should be allotted to the security forces as proposed by His
Majesty the King.
The Chief Operations Officer of
the Royal Bhutan Army expressed his deep appreciation for the proposal to allot
the illegal land in southern Bhutan to the security forces. He said that such
generous considerations by the government and the people would go a long way in
boosting their morale.
The National Assembly resolved
that taking into account the well-being of the people and to strengthen national
security, the illegal land holdings in the southern Dzongkhags should be
allotted first to security force personnel and the Militia Volunteers. The
additional land after such allotments should be given to landless people and to
people with very small land holdings, to facilitate the national objective of
ensuring equitable land distribution.
6. Withdrawal of
Citizenship Identity Cards:
The People's Representatives of
Tshogongma, Athang, Tshowogma, Kazhi, Phangyuel, Rubey and Sephu under
Wangdiphodrang Dzongkhag reported that the family members and relatives of the
ngolops were assisting the ngolops in their terrorist activities by serving as
messengers and as informants through their unrestricted movements. They proposed
that in order to prevent this in the interest of national security, the Royal
Government should withdraw their Citizenship identity cards.
The Home Minister replied that
from the beginning, everyone had been issued with identity cards in accordance
with the Citizenship Act and since many identity cards were being stolen and
also forged by the ngolops, it would serve no useful purpose to withdraw them.
He, however, agreed that, in keeping with the common concern of the people and
the government on the subject, then ngolops and their immediate family members
and relatives should be dealt with according to the relevant articles of the
Citizenship Act as and when they were caught or proven to have engaged in
anti-national- activities. Anyone violating security procedures would be dealt
with according to the security es and regulations. He, therefore, felt that
there was no need to withdraw the Identity Cards.
The concerned representatives of
the people clarified that the matter was brought before the National Assembly in
light of the people's concern over the anti-national problem which began in
September. 1990. As they expressed their satisfaction with the explanation and
assurances of the Home Minister, the National Assembly resolved that there was
no need to take any action on the subject.
7. No Citizenship for
Non-Nationals married to Bhutanese Citizens
The People's Representatives of
Samkhar, Tashigang proposed that any foreigner marrying a Bhutanese should not
be granted Bhutanese Citizenship.
In thus regard, the
representative of the people of Bumthang noted that, even though the National
Assembly had resolved during its 67th Session in 1988, that any foreigner
marrying a Bhutanese, Citizen after 1985 would not be granted Bhutanese
Citizenship, many Southern Bhutanese continued to marry foreigners. He pointed
out that with the Royal Government continuing to grant citizenship to such
people, the Citizenship Act was being undermined. He called for strict
implementation of the Act for all those who had entered Bhutan through marriage
after 1985.
Appreciating the observation made
by the People's Representatives, the Home Minister said that as long as the
grant of citizenship was based according to the Marriage Act and Citizenship Act
of 1985, and the relevant resolution of the 67th Session of the National
Assembly, there would be no problem regarding the point raised by the
representatives.
The concerned representatives
expressed their appreciation and as there were no more discussion on the
subject, the National Assembly resolved that the Ministry of Home Affairs should
act in accordance with the above existing laws and the resolutions of the
National Assembly in the case of marriages involving foreigners.
8. Identification of ngolops and
their collaborators
The People's Representative of
Tongsa Dzongkhag reminded the House that, during the 69Lh Session of the
National Assembly, the Royal Advisory Councillors and the Chimis of southern
Bhutan had insisted that the anti-national dism6ances in the south had been
instigated by outsiders. Short of making a sworn pledge, they had further
assured the House that such problems would never arise again from the south.
They noted that a] though many of
the Chimis from the south had now been replaced because they had been involved
in anti-national activities and had absconded, the concerned Royal Advisory
Councillors who were still present in the Assembly were aware of the extent to
which this assurance had been grossly violated. Consequently, it was inevitable
that the people of other Dzongkhags should lose their faith in the Lhotshampas.
They stated that it was for this reason that the assurances now being given by
the new Lhotsham representatives could no longer be accepted at face value.
Therefore, as proposed earlier by the Lhotsham representatives that the
Lhotshampas themselves would help the government to identify the ngolops, the
full responsibility of identifying the ngolops and their collaborators must be
taken by the Lhotshampas.
This proposal was supported by
many members who stated that the Gups, Chimis and the people in the south would
always be fully aware of any stranger or anti-national element who entered their
villages. They insisted that they must, therefore, fully aware the
responsibility of identifying the ngolops and their collaborators.
One of the Royal Advisory
Councillors of southern Bhutan replied that, in view of the strict
implementation of the Citizenship Act and the Land Act, everyone was aware of
how much illegal land had been discovered after the recent cadastral survey in
Samchi and Saindrup Jangkhar. He claimed that the success of this survey was due
mainly to the support extended by the genuine citizens in southern Bhutan
towards identifying the illegal immigrants. He, therefore felt that it would be
adequate if the Land Act and the Citizenship Act were implemented
faithfully.
The representatives of Samchi and
Kalikhola submitted that even though the ngolops were from the south, all Lhotshampas
were not ngolops. They claimed that the main leaders of the
ngolops and those who had committed anti-national activities had all absconded,
and that the remaining Lhotshampas were true and loyal to the TSA-WA-SUM
as well as strict adherents to the traditions, culture and laws of
Bhutan. They acknowledge that it was the responsibility of the concerned
villagers to identify the ngolops in the respective areas. In this regard they
reported that in the recent s which was conducted at Samchi and Samjongkhar and
in the on-going census at Sarbhang, all verifications and necessary
investigations were carried out through close co-operation between the census
teams led by the Dungpas and the census committees of the people.
They submitted that such genuine
and purposeful cooperation between the government and the people they had been
successful in identifying the illegal immigrants who had entered Bhutan as well
as those associated with the ngolops. As for the responsibility of the people of
southern Bhutan to identify the ngolops, they reported that they had been
extending their full cooperation to the security forces.
The Home Minister agreed that it
would be very useful if the people themselves and their Gups and Chimis assisted
the Royal Government in identifying the illegal immigrants and the collaborators
of the ngolops. He added that all those who were identified wold be subjected to
further verification by the of the local people concerned committees and
sub-committees of the local people with whom the Royal Government would conduct
joint invegestigation.
The Assembly appreciated the
Support and cooperation extended by the concerned Gups, Chimis and the people of
southern Bhutan to the best of their knowledge and ability. The Assembly further
expressed its hope and confidence that the Southern Bhutanese people would
continue to extend such support towards identifying the ngolops and their
collaborators as well as illegal immigrants in the interest of national security
and in ensuring the peace and stability of the country.
9. Checking of
Identity Cards and Vehicles at the Checkposts
The People's Representatives Of
Lingbu, Shelnga and Beme ofpunakha Dzongkhag pointed out that from the very
beginning, only heavy vehicles and Passengers travelling in buses were subjected
to identification checks at the various checkposts while those travelling in
light vehicles were being exempted. He proposed that, henceforth the identity of
passengers travelling all vehicles should be checked, irrespective of rank and
status and that the checkposts should be manned with competent personnel.
To this, the Home Minister
replied that in view of the disturbances in the country and the need for
everyone to be concerned and to assume a greater sense of responsibility and
commitment to one's duty, officers from the Department of Immigration and Census
had been appointed at various checkposts. He reported that, in accordance with
the Citizenship Act, they had been discharging their responsibility of
controlling the movement of illegal immigrants and those who might pose a threat
to the security of the country. He further reported that, apart from the
diplomats and the military vehicles, who were exempted from checks, all other
vehicles and passengers were being subjected to proper verification.
The Minister, however, submitted
that the Ministry of Home Affairs would have no difficulty if the National
Assembly were to pass a resolution calling for conducting of stricter checks on
all vehicles passing through the checkposts irrespective of the type of vehicles
and the rank and status of their passengers.
The representatives of the people
urged that while they did not see any harm in continuing to exempt the diplomats
and the military, every citizen including all government servants should not
only be required to carry their Identity Cards but should be mandatory for
government servants to carry orders from their respective offices whether the
reason for their movements was private or official. They further urged that the
should be included in the resolution of the National Assembly in the interest of
the country's security.
At this point. the Chief
Operations Officer explained that it was an international practice to allow free
passage of military vehicles through various checkposts. He, however, assured
the Assembly that the RBA vehicles which often carried arms and ammunitions in
connection with the current security problems, would be properly checked and
secured before they began their movement. He therefore felt that there was no
need for the RBP or the immigration authorities to check the military vehicles
at the checkposts.
Since there was no objection or
any further intervention from the members, the National Assembly resolved that
the diplomats and the military personnel would continue to enjoy unhindered
passage at the checkposts, while all types of vehicles and their passengers,
irrespective of rank and status, should be subjected to verification of Identity
Cards.
10. Matters relating to dual
citizenship
The people's Representative of
Tongsa called the attention of the House to the practice of holding dual
citizenship and Owning land and properties outside the country by many
Lhotshampas. They requested that the Royal Government should conduct an
investigation and take action against such persons.
The Home Minister replied that in
accordance with the Citizenship Act, any Bhutanese citizen who was found to hold
the citizenship of another country would immediately forfeit his proven. He
submitted that Bhutanese citizenship upon being so the law being very clear, its
implementation did not pose any problem.
As the concerned representative
was satisfied with the reply of the Home Minister, the National Assembly
resolved that, in accordance with the submission of the Home Minister and
the relevant provision under the Citizenship Act, the Royal Government should
take suitable actions against those found holding dual citizenship.
11. Matter
concerning Form No. '5' of the Census Records
The people's Representative of
Dagapela under Dagan Dzongkhag informed the House' that inspite of the Royal
Government having given incentives to encourage inter-marriages between
Lhotshampas and other citizens of the country, there had been very few
inter-marriages. On the other hand, everyone was aware that the number of
Lhotshampa marrying non-nationals and the issues from such marriages ran into
tens of thousands. He further expressed his concern that the popular tendency of
the Lhotshampa girls to marry non-national Nepalese and continue to live in the
country, instead of going as brides to their husband's homes, as was customary,
would lead to further influx of immigrants as their relatives of the husbands
could be encouraged by them to migrate into Bhutan. It was, therefore, proposed
that all women marrying foreigners should be deprived of their citizenships. In
addition, the census Form No. 5 which enabled foreigners married to Bhutanese
nationals to avail citizenship should be changed.
Many members of the Assembly
recalled that during the 67th s Form No. '5' had been Citizenship Act to help
the Southern Bhutanese whose daughters were married to foreigners. The members
therefore appreciated the proposal of the Lhotshampa Chimi from Dagapela that
Form No. '5' should be discontinued.
The Home Minister informed the
House that in accordance with the resolution adopted in the.67th session of the
National Assembly, all issues g to marriage with foreigners should be decided on
the basis of the Marriage Act and the Citizenship Act of 1985. He clarified that
Form No.5 was only a means to obtain and verify information pertaining to
marriages with outsiders without which the Marriage Act could not be implemented
effectively. The National Assembly, therefore, resolved that Form No.5 should
not be invalidated or altered.
12.
Implementation of the Citizenship Act
The People's Representative of
Pemagatshel invoked the Citizenship Act of 1985 which granted citizenship to all
those who had immigrated to Bhutan before 1958, when the nationality Act was
passed and citizenship was granted to the Southern Bhutanese for the first time,
while those entering thereafter would not be given this right. He stated that by
taking advantage of the concessions made after the 1985 Citizenship Art was
passed, to accommodate some of the genuine problems of the Lhotshampas, large
numbers of illegal @grants had entered the country and settled among our people.
The representative drew the
attention of the House to the alarming extent to which these illegal immigrants
had become a considerable economic burden upon the state by enjoying free access
to all kinds of benefits including free health and education facilities and
employment. He advised very strongly that the Royal Government should implement
the Citizenship Act and the related resolutions of the National Assembly without
any concessions and exceptions.
The Home Minister noted that the
objective of implementing the Citizenship Act effectively to enhance national
security was a mutual concern of the people and the government. Since the
responsibility of achieving this objective lay with the Home Ministry, he
reported that the Ministry was doing its very best to this responsibility by
strictly implementing the Citizenship Act.
Although in keeping with
Citizenship Act, the concerned Dzongdas and officials had been visiting each
house on a door to door basis while conducting the annual census in their
respective jurisdictions, they had not been able to obtain accurate census
records. Therefore ,senior officials and trained census enumerators had been
sent to every Dzongkhags to conduct the census thoroughly. The Minister also
reported that unless and until all information including identity of parents,
place of birth, number of siblings, identity of spouse etc. were thoroughly
verified, no Citizenship identity cards were being carelessly issued to anyone.
The National Assembly noted with
satisfaction the dedication and commitment with which the concerned Ministries,
Departments and Dzongkhags had strived to implement the Citizenship Act. The
Assembly furtjer directed that, with fun dedication to the long term interests
of the country, all government agencies should continue to strictly implement
the Citizenship Act and the related resolutions of the National Assembly without
fear Or favour, unmindful of social or economic status and irrespective of rank
or power.
13. Revival of
the tradition of the Pazaab System (Militia)
The People's Representatives of
the 41 gewogs from the Dzongkhags of Tongsa. Punakha, Wangdi Phodrang, Haa,
Chukh Mongar, Tashigang, PemagaLshei and Dagana submitted thirteen points
recommending that the ancient tradition of Pazaab which was still practiced in a
ritual form each year in Punakha Dzong should not only be revived but
strengthened as a moder militia force.
The Chimis stated that the
responsibility of defending the security and sovereignty of the country was the
inalienable right and responsibility of all true citizens. They cited that since
ancient times the tradition of raising Pazaab forces out of volunteers from each
household had ensured the successful defence of the country against both
internal and external threats. Even though Bhutan had not maintained a trained
and regular Army, the people had defended their country successfully during
numerous wars fought against the Tibetans and the British.
The representatives submitted
that such volunteer forces should be raised today and maintained at minimal cost
to deal with the ngolops who continued to carry out large scale acts of
terrorism and subversion. Many of the Chimis shared the view that they conducted
militia programme should be expanded and the training duration increased. In
this connection the age limit for entry into the militia should be relaxed to
allow all men between the age of 15 and 60 to avail training.
They be further proposed that
those who had completed militia training should be given the opportunity to join
the regular security forces and assist them in discharging internal security
responsibilities. Furthermore, the militia training Programme should be
conducted on a regular basis and should include women, many of whom had
already volunteered to join. Furthermore, since the Gups, Chimis and Village
Elders were participating in the militia training programme, government servants
and students should also be given the opportunity to avail militia training.
To this, the Chief Operation
Officer replied that the Royal Bhutan Army was filled with pride and deeply
heartened by the patriotic spirit of the people and the willingness of both men
and women to join the militia forces in such large numbers. He proposed that
with regard to the age limit, the Army should be empowered to take appropriate
decisions on the basis of the physical fitness of the. individual volunteers.
As for the duration of training,
he was most happy to report that the militia volunteers had been able to
successfully complete the equivalent of one year's regular military training
within four months and that those who were now serving with the security forces
were able to perform as well as the regular soldiers.
The Minister of Communications
and Social Services informed the Assembly that there were many students who had
volunteered to join the militia with great enthusiasm, and a large number had
actually received training. However, since His Majesty the King had been pleased
to command that the students should continue the ir education, they were not
permitted to serve with the security forces. I
At this point, the representative
of the Rabdey in the Royal Advisory Council reported that in order to enable the
security forces to achieve the objective of restoring peace and security
in the country under the wise and able leadership of His Majesty the King, all
the monk bodies and the monasteries throughout the country had been performing
continuous prayers for the peace and security of the country and the
well-being of the people. He said that it was the constant and cherished
wish of the Monastic bodies to ensure that no harm would ever fall upon His
Majesty the King and through his inspiring leadership and wise guidance, the
members of the security forces, as well as the people, would always be protected
against all possible harm.
In the course of the
deliberations, several representatives of the people made strong recommendations
to expand and strengthen the Army. Others made suggestions that the Royal
Government should issue weapons to those who had received militia training or
that they should be authorised to make their own arrangements for the
acquisition of arms. Many members also recommended that the Royal Government
should immediately withdraw the standing order forbidding the security forces
from resorting to direct firing even when attacked by armed ngolops.
The Chief Operations Officer
responded that the Royal Bhutan Army should be empowered to strengthen its
security forces on the basis of requirement and need and that in the case of
militia personnel, they would be issued with suitable arms as and when their
services were utilized. He further stated that the acquisition of arms and
ammunition for personal use should be done in keeping with the National Arms and
Ammunition Act. He informed the House that during the months of September and
October in 1990, when the, anti-nationals had indulged in violent demonstrations
in the five Dzongkhags and one Dungkhag of the south, from Sibsoo in the west
upto Daifarn in the east, the terrorists had marched behind a human shield of
women and children followed by villagers carrying Khukuries while they
themselves carried guns, grenades and bombs and wore camouflage uniforms.
Intending to take advantage of
the small number of security personnel, they had advanced violently in all the
Dzongkhags and Dungkhags openly brandishing their weapons. 'Me security
personnel faced extreme difficulties in view of the Royal Command that not a
single round should be fired by any soldier under any circumstances. This
command was issued to ensure that the security personnel did not inflict injury
on any one of their fellow citizens even though they would be putting their own
lives to risk. By courageously adhering to this Royal Order, several security
personnel lost their lives at the hands of the violent mobs and many were
seriously injured.
Since then, the ngolops had been
carrying out large-scale terrorism against the people. Having become common
terrorists and armed enemies of the state, the security forces were now taking
appropriate and successful measures against the ngolops in keeping with military
tactics and procedures. The Chief Operations Officer said that the success of
the security forces in discharging their duties was due to the wise and
inspiring leadership of His Majesty the King and the prayers and good wishes of
the monastic bodies and the people who, like members of one family, had all
rallied to inspire and give moral support to the security forces. The Chief
Operations officer expressed his appreciation and said he was confident of
continued support and commitment from all sections of the Bhutanese People.
On behalf of all there
representatives, the Speaker conveyed the deep appreciation of the National
Assembly to the officers and members of the security forces, through the Chief
Operations Officers, for the valiant and courageous manner in which they had
shouldered the responsibility of maintaining law and order and ensuring the
safety and security if the country.
He further thanked the Chief
Operations Officer for the clear views of the Army and the relevant steps that
were being taken in connection with the age limit, duration, and nature of
training for the militia. He also thanked him for giving clarifications on the
procedures governing personal arms in response to the various views and opinions
raised by the People's Representatives. Therefore, as proposed by the Speaker,
the National Assembly resolved to, accept, and approve the explanations and
recommendation of the Chief Operations Officer of the Royal Bhutan Army on the
various issues that were raised on the subject of the Pazaab System.
21. Greater priority for the
nation & security than for development works
The People's Representatives of
20 gewogs from the Dzongkhags of Pemagatshel, Lhuntshi, Thimphu, Wangdiphodrang
and Tashigang submitted six points emphasizing that greater priority should be
given to the security of the country than to the implementation of developmental
works. The development programmes implemented by the government upto now had
already brought great socio-economic benefits to the people in the areas of
Education, Health, Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Roads and Communication, and
raised the per capita income and standard of living. It was of course, very
important to maintain this excellent pace of development However, at a time when
the security and wellbeing of the country was being threatened, it was far more
important to give total priority to ensuring the security of the nation. For
their part, the people were ready to even sacrifice their lives for the security
of the nation. Development works were of lesser importance during such times as
they could always be resumed once the ngolop problem was removed. Therefore, the
,representatives proposed that development works should be suspended till the
ngolop problem was removed and the budgets diverted to meet the
additional expenditure for ensuring the security of the country.
The People's Representatives
further submitted that it was the ngolops in southern Bhutan who had disturbed
the peace and tranquility of the country. It was because of the large scale
terrorism unleashed by them that development works had been disrupted in
southern Bhutan, and it was because of their continued terrorist and subversive
activities that security forces had to be deployed in the disturbed areas.
Therefore, all development works in southern Bhutan should be stopped and the
funds diverted for meeting security expenditures.
The Home Minister addressed the
Assembly and said that he deeply appreciated the patriotic feelings and
views of the Chimis and the proposal which they had submitted on behalf of the
people from all parts of Bhutan that greater priority should be given to
the security of the nation than to development works. At a time when the
security of the nation was threatened it was given to the security of the nation
than to development works. At a time when the security of the nation was
threatened it was indeed gratifying that the government and the people were
totally united and singleminded in their determination to overcome the grave
threat to the nation. He recalled that past Bhutanese generations too bad been
totally dedicated and committed to the national interest and had even risked
their lives to safeguard the security of the nation. They had bequeathed us with
the legacy of a secure and sovereign, independent nation and it was now our
sacred responsibility to safeguard and hand over this proud legacy to our future
generations, the Home Minister said. The Home Minister, therefore, deeply
appreciated the proposal of the representatives to suspend development works
during the forthcoming 7th Plan and divert the funds to meet the additional
expenditure for ensuring the nation's security.
His Majesty the King then
addressed the Assembly and said that rather dm cut back on development works, he
felt that extra efforts should be made to achieve greater economic progress in
the 7th Plan period. He said that a budget of Nu.15,000 million had been
proposed for the Plan and every effort would also be made to mobilise additional
funds to promote further development in the country in order to raise the per
capita income and living standard of the people. His Majesty recommended that
the National Assembly should instead resolve that the 7th Plan, which would
begin in June 1992, should be implemented even more vigorously than the 5th and
6Lh Plans in order to bring greater progress and prosperity to the people and
the country. He pointed out that if the people and the government worked
together single mindedly, there should be no reason why the important national
objectives of the 7th Plan could- not be fulfilled in all the 18 Dzongkhags of
the country. Regarding the expenditures or budget for security measures, the
Finance Ministry had been diverting a little portion of country's internal
revenues to meet some of the cost. If there were further requirements, the
Finance Ministry could set aside 10% to15% of the internal revenue collections
to meet security expenditures. This money would be kept intact unless required
and could be taken back by the Finance Ministry if not spent.
The Royal Advisory Councillors
and some of the People's Representatives thanked His Majesty for his unwavering
commitment to promote the prosperity, well-being and security of the people and
the country. They deeply appreciated His Majesty's desire to implement the 7th
Plan fully despite the present problems in the country.
One of the representatives from
Bumthang said that the Lhotshampas had brought trouble with them from the time
they had migrated to Bhutan. Although the Royal Government had implemented many
development programmes and established many service facilities for them the
Lhotshampas had themselves destroyed these facilities and disrupted development
activities. Therefore, if these facilities were reestablished, there was every
possibility of them being destroyed again. Therefore, until the ngolop problem
was removed. no development activities should be carried out, they said.
Other representatives stated that
if the government decides to implement the 7th Plan in. the southern Dzongkhags,
and if the ngolops continued with their anti-national activities and the
Southern Bhutanese people continued. to maintain their present ambivalent and
uncommitted attitude, then ngolop problem would not only disrupt the development
activities in the southern Dzongkhags but also affect development works in
northern Dzongkhags. Therefore, all development works in the southern Dzongkhags
should be stopped until the ngolop problem was removed.
The Chimis from Tashi Yangtse, Shemgang, Tongsa
and Paro noted that because of the continued anti-national and terrorist
activities of the ngolops in southern Bhutan it had become imperative to give
greater priority to the security of the nation. As it was important to further
strengthen security forces through training as well as procurement of equipment,
and also because the government would have to incur much additional expenditure
for security purposes, the entire 7th Plan budget for development activities in
southern Bhutan -should be diverted to meet security expenditures.
One of the Royal Advisory Councillors from
southern Bhutan, said that the Five Year Plans were not meant for just one
Dzongkhag or one Dungkhag but for the entire country. There had been no problem
regarding the implementation of any of the Plans upto the 6th Plan and
development works had been progressing very well in the country. Anti-national
and terrorist activities did not take place only in Bhutan but also happened in
other countries. He noted that the people in the other 13 Dzongkhags wanted to
stop development activities in the 5 Dzongkhags and 1 Dungkhag of southern
Bhutan because they were upset anti-national activities were taking place in the
southern Dzongkhags. He, however, pointed out that the southern Dzongkhags were
an integral part of Bhutan and requested the members to of the overall national
interest. He reminded the members that His Majesty the King had already
explained the matter very clearly. He requested that a distinction be made
between the ngolops and the loyal Southern Bhutanese and that the implementation
of development works allowed to take place as planned.
The People's Representative of
Kalikhola expressed his deep gratitude to His Majesty the King for the great
love and impartially with which he had always promoted the interests and welfare
of all the people of southern Bhutan and all Bhutanese citizens regardless of
their race or creed. In particular, His Majesty had always been especially
considerate to all Lhotsham people. He requested His Majesty for his further
kind consideration and understanding. He also requested the members not to
consider all Lbotshampas as ngolops.
Some representatives pointed out
that although the Lhotshampas were recent immigrants, they had been given
preferential treatment by the government even after they were granted Bhutanese
citizenship, and had received more benefits from development programmes. So, if
the Lhotshampas themselves gave clear proof through their actions that they were
not all ngolops due consideration could be given for the implementation of
developmental activities in southern Bhutan.
The majority of the
representatives proposed that until the ngolop problem was removed, all
development works in southern Bhutan should be stopped and the budget diverted
for security expenditures.
The Chief Operations Officer of
the RBA then addressed the Assembly and thanked the People's Representatives for
their deep concern for the financial and logistic burdens faced by the
government on account of the deployment of the security forces. This was
reflected in their proposal to stop developmental works m the south and divert
the funds for security expenditures. Although it was up to the National Assembly
and the Royal Government to decide whether development works in the south should
be implemented or not, he felt that it was necessary for him to submit some
points for due consideration. He reminded the Assembly that one of the main
reasons for security forces being deployed in the south was in connection with
development activities. Security was being provided to all administrative
centres and important service facilities and installations like schools,
hospitals, bridges, projects and industries. Security also had to be provided to
all government employees working in the disturbed southern Dzongkhags. In view
of the existing heavy commitments, he asked the members to note that it would be
extremely difficult for the security forces to provide security for any
additional development activities under the present circumstances.
The Minister of Trade and
Industries then addressed the assembly and said that most of the major
industries and commercial centres and towns were located in southern Bhutan. In
the wake of the large scale anti-national activities, all the major industrial
establishments faced grave risks from the terrorists. Although the security
forces were doing their best to protect all the important establishments, the
terrorists had inflicted big losses to the government with acts of sabotage like
the felling of electrical pylons supplying power to the Penden Cement Factory in
Gomtu. Most of the industries proposed in the 7th Plan were to be located in the
south, and promoting industrial development was one of the most important 7th
Plan objectives. The Ministry of Trade and Industries was, therefore, deeply
concerned by the serious difficulties , and grave security risks involved in
implementing the industrial development programmes in the south due to the
continued anti-national activities.
The Minister of Social Services and Communication
the Director General of Health Services and the Director General of Education
stated that large scale arson and destruction had been carried out in the south
on health and education establishments and facilities. Many schools and health
centres had been destroyed and looted by the anti-nationals. Teachers, doctors
and health workers had been threatened, harassed and attacked by the terrorists,
and many of the schools and health establishments had to be closed down. Despite
these terrorist activities many schools, health centres and all the 9 hospitals
in southern Bhutan had been kept open on the command of His Majesty the King, As
people working in the disturbed areas faced constant risk to their lives, the
concerned Departments were facing serious difficulties in staffing these
establishments. Because of the grave risks from continued terrorist activities,
the Departments of Health and Education submitted that it would be extremely
difficult to resume development programmes in the south until the anti-national
problem was resolved.
His Majesty the King told the Assembly that
despite the serious security problems in the south, the government had,, managed
to keep open 44 schools and 4 national educational institutions in the southern
Dzongkhags and had also accommodated 6,738 Southern Bhutanese students, from the
schools which had to be closed down, in the schools in other parts of Bhutan.
Despite the continued
terrorist activities, every effort would be made
to re-open at least 10 more schools in southern Bhutan in the following year. As
many schools in the south had been either destroyed or damaged by the
terrorists, they would have to be re-built by the Department of Education in
areas that were more safe from terrorist attacks. Inspite of the high cost that
would be involved, His Majesty ended that the National Assembly should pass a
resolution to establish at least 10 additional schools in southern Bhutan.
His Majesty also informed the Assembly that all
the 9 hospitals in southern Bhutan, 17 BHUS, 8 Dispensaries, 33 Outreach Clinics
and 16 Malaria Centres had been kept open despite the continued terrorist
activities. He said that every effort would be made to open at least 8 BHUs and
Dispensaries by next year. This would bring the number of health facilities kept
o to 91. These facilities could also provide all essential he coverage to the
people including, pre-natal and post-natal care, child immunization and TB and
leprosy control programmes. Majesty requested the National Assembly to pass, a
resolution to this effect.
His Majesty said that he was
fully aware that although the Royal Government had carried out extensive
development works in the south at great cost, the anti-nationals in southern
Bhutan, instead of showing their appreciation, had destroyed and damaged many of
the facilities established for their benefit. He said that it was not out of
compassion that he was recommending the implementation of development projects
in southern Bhutan. He was actually keeping in mind the larger interest and the
long term security and well-being of the nation and the national goal of
achieving a uniform ad balanced development throughout the country. His Majesty
told the Assembly that the construction of a 65 Km motor road would be
undertaken between Bhangtar and Samdrupjongkhar next year at an estimated cost
of Nu.160 million, His Majesty also informed the members that the Dungkhag
offices in Dagapela and Bhangtar, which had to be closed down in the wake of the
large scale anti-national activities, would be re-opened in 1992.
The Representatives of the
Government and the People submitted that although the wishes and commands of His
Majesty the King were sacred and inviolate, they begged to submit their sincere
and heartfelt views on the matter of resuming development works in southern
Bhutan. The Royal Government had always given preferential treatment to the
Southern Bhutanese and had implemented more development works in the south than
in northern parts of the country. The Southern Bhutanese had been given more
land and also enjoyed far greater benefits in the areas of education. health and
employment. Most of the industries and commercial centre were in their
dzongkhags and they enjoyed a much higher income than the rest of the people in
Bhutan. Despite all this, they had turned and bitten the very hand that had been
feeding them.
One of the Chirnis from Haa said
that in the process of openly rebelling against the TSA-WA-SUM, the Lhotshampas
had burnt down mid destroyed the very schools where their children were being
educated, the hospitals and health centres where they were being treated and the
roads and bridges that were being used by them. Even their children had abused
and attacked the teachers who had been educating them. The Lhotshampas people
had threatened, attacked, kidnapped and murdered government officials and staff
who were implementing development programmes for their benefit. In spite of the
treacherous and subversive intentions of these people and the large scale
terrorism unleashed by them. which had caused great destruction and loss to the
country, many service facilities had still been kept open at great cost and risk
by the government.
Most of the members expressed,
strong reservation about resuming development works and opening schools and
health facilities in the south in addition to the ones already kept open. Some
members proposed that only roads and health facilities should be kept open in
the southern Dzongkhags. Other members submitted that it would not only be
pointless but a source of unnecessary loss and expenditure and risk to resume
development activities and open additional service facilities in the south as it
would only result in their being destroyed once again by the ngolops. If the
Lhotshampas wanted to re-open or re-build the facilities destroyed by them, they
should do so themselves at their own cost.
Other members submitted that at
this stage, development works should either be suspended in the south or only
taken up on a very small scale until the situation returned to normal. Some
other members proposed that only those facilities and establishments that were
already existing should be maintained and no additional facilities should be
opened. One of the Chimi from Thimphu on the other hand, proposed that rather
than open additional facilities in the south, even the existing ones should be
closed down. Several representatives submitted that there was no need to rush
into any decision now and that it should be left upto the behaviour and ,actions
of the Lhotshampas to determine whether development works should be stopped or
resumed.
The Minister of Trade and Industry said that it
was true that the ngolops had destroyed many facilities like schools and
hospitals. However, it should be noted that not all Lhotshampas were ngolops.
He, therefore, requested that facilities such as schools and hospitals should be
reopened for the benefit of these Lhotshampas. The Minister also thanked His
Majesty the King for taking the full responsibility of finding a lasting
solution to the ngolop problem in southern Bhutan. He said that the
representatives of the government, the clergy and the people should all g |